The book is a small 32 pages (+ cover) paperback booklet, with great illustrations. It contains a nose flute user manual (including troubleshooting section!), advices, anecdotes (gentle mixes of "urban" and "traditional" nose flutes) and... history facts.
The scanned pages that follow are copyrighted by Andrews McMeel Publishing. Their publication here is made on an informative purpose (book review and critics), and with no intention of infringement.
So much nonsense per square inch! How could some redactor have written that ??
We know that the name Humanatone already existed in 1894 (even before), that plastic nose flutes appeared in the 1925s (the Humanaphone made in celluloid), that the shape of the plastic Humanatone was patented in 1940 (only) by Ernest Davis, that those plastic Humanatones were issued by Gretsch in 1943, and that the Humanatone nose flutes were launched probably by Garrett J. Couchois (who used the brand name), but surely then by the Stivers' Humanatone Introducing Novelty Co., who registered their brand in 1904, then 1905 (which had been "continuously used in [their] business since July 6th, 1903".
So, how could someone have written that ? : lazyness. Yes, "the rest is history", because this was not.
Indeed, there was a company which produced a "talking machine" (phonograph) called Humanatone, and which published its first advertisement in 1917 in the World of Talking Machines. Yes, the company was settled in New York (Brooklyn, actually). But it had nothing to see with the Stivers. The same "brand name", but not the same "trade-mark". And why would someone use the same name without using the same logo? Either you want to get the benefit of a reknown brand and you use both, or you don't and use none. If James J. Stivers had founded a talking machine company with the famous tin nose flute name, he would have used the regular Humanatone logo, designed by his brother George. Last, the Stivers weren't implanted in Brooklyn in 1917, but Ann St., Manhattan downtown.
OK, nobody knew those facts before noseflute.org researches, but when I don't know, I stay mute.
Please, Mr. McMeel, if you ever publish a second edition, please change this page 24!
:-)
ReplyDeleteGreat to see such packaging, sad to see it applied to such a lousy version of the instrument. Fortunately we are seeing more and more fabulous designs containing proper versions of the instrument today.
Yes, Maikel. 10 years have gone. Anyway, I think the Humanatone (as crappy as it has become) is a reference in the USA. Humanatone = nose flute = Humanatone.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes : :-)
what a nice find and funny drawings! And your text is not too long (nor too scientific:), great stuff, merci :)
ReplyDeleteMerci, miss Diva
Delete