Mr. David Lapp is a Physics teacher who is the author of many Physics and Education publications (see here).
The Physics of Music and Musical Instruments is a 119 pages PDF book (download it here) with 7 chapters, among them one is dedicated to Aerophones (wind instruments). Those 24 pages are obviouly mostly devoted to the study of vibrations, air flow, sound waves, differences between open and closed pipes, providing the right equations for each type of instrument. The chapters include exercises and are ended by one or more "Investigation" sections. One of those, in the Aerophone chapter, is devoted to the nose flute.
The nose flute is comparable to a closed pipe, with a variable pitch, exactly like a slide whistle, which stopper would be your tongue. At the very end of the book, there is a Physics of Music Resource Vendors section, and the very last paragraph is this text:
Well, I'm not going to paraphrase what Mr. Lapp explains in his article, but just sum it up:
- Vibrations in a nose flute act as in a closed pipe, like a slide whistle
- The frequency provided by closed pipes is the result of the equation F = v/4L
(where v is the speed of sound and L the vibrating length)
The two next pages are a form of 6 questions-exercises. The two last are interesting, notably the #5:
If you played the nose flute, what is the lowest theoretical note on the Equal Tempered Scale that you personally would be able to get? (You will need to make a measurement to answer this question.)
Well, using the F = v/4L equation, with (v = 343 m/s for the speed of sound) and measuring my mouth depth drove me to wrong results... Indeed, I previously checked with a frequency meter the lowest and sharpest notes I can produce with a Bocarina™ nose flute.
If someone can explain me this result...
Is F=v/4L really the right model to apply to a nose flute ?
Should it not be a Helmholtz resonator (much more tricky, by the way)?
---
>>To Nose Flute Physics - Part 2
Ah yes, the same applies for jew's harps (guimbardes en Français). In his mastrs thesis "Helmholts & coupled resonators acoustics in jew's harp playing" Sylvain Trias explains in 109 pages how it works. It's very complicated and beyond my capability to sum this up in a few words here. Better read it yourself. Here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6Kf2pm4kLhFYjI3Mjc1YjctZjdmMi00MTMzLTg1MjAtODRhMmI0YzAyOWZh/edit?hl=en&pli=1 Jew's'harps are overtone instruments and noseflutes are not but the principles will remain the same I guess.
ReplyDeleteYours, Harm
Thank you Harm! I'm gonna read that good stuff :)
ReplyDeleteAgain, great find! I love the questions which are great teasers.
ReplyDeleteIt would be very interesting to measure the wind tones and whisper tones that the nose flute can produce.
It's a very good and high level textbook !
ReplyDeleteWikipedia "Helmholtz resonance" is interesting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_resonance
one of the links.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/cavity.html
The table of the whisler's tone range on this page is also interesting.
# I coudn't find the original english source.
http://torinaki.com/whistling-info/tone-range
My range was F4 to G7.
Thank you for the links too, dear Hiroshi! I will study that and publish a second part to this little study
DeleteWell guys, it's good that there are people involved in physics and stuff, me for my part am just a lazy music player, besides that a diva, so you have my great respect and appreciation but I will not follow into the depths of noseflute physics, sorry :( - but really a cool thing to think about if you like to think ;)
ReplyDeleteDear Diva, you are very welcome NOT to be interested in those technical posts! :) Your art flies far above those little considerations.
Delete